Our Phone Number: 202-269-6650       ||        4501 South Dakota Ave NE, Washington, DC 20017

The Lonergan Institute

"for the good under construction"

Home
About Us
Annual Newsletter
The Idea
Board Members
The Living Cosmopolis
Blog

Dialogue Partners
Phyllis Wallbank
Fr. Louis Roy, O.P.
Fr. Giovanni Sala, S.J. 

Dr. Giuseppe Badini
J. Michael Stebbins

Books Online
Foundations of Philosophy (Deutsch) by Fr. Brian  Cronin 
Transforming Light by Fr. Richard Liddy

Affiliated Sites
Österreich
Français
Axial Press

Lonergan Links
LWS

Lonergan Archive
Bogota
Boston
Dublin
India
Seton Hall
Toronto
LA

Rome
Woodstock
Chile
Sydney
Macrodynamic Analysis

 

 

 
 
 

                   

 

7/14/2007
Eric Voegelin, Plato and Aristotle, vol. 3 - Order and History
The Republic, chap. 3, sec. 5.3 - sec., 6 – The Disintegration of Order, pp. 123-134
Joanne Tetlow, J.D., Ph.D.

Download a PDF version of this document

The cosmic cycle of order and disorder has reached its conclusion.  Before his diversion after book four to the topics of women and family, the philosopher-ruler, and education of the philosopher (books five, six, and seven respectively), Socrates picks up his original line of dialogue with Glaucon about the best and worst states.  Having asserted that the best polis is one of justice in the soul and society, Socrates provides a classic articulation of how a healthy, ordered polis degenerates into a sick, disordered one.  The decline goes as follows:

Timocracy



                                Oligarchy



                                                          Democracy



                                                                                          Tyranny

The explanation for this is anthropological not institutional. Man’s psyche is the force of the soul that fuels the degeneration.  The analogy in book seven shows the distinction between the intelligible realm of knowledge (episteme) with intelligence (noesis) and mathematical reasoning (dianoia) as its parts, and the visible realm of opinion (doxa) with its components of belief (pistis) and illusion (eikasia), both operating in the shadows and images of physical things.  Thus, the rational element of the soul has both intelligible forms and visible appearances.  This is not the whole of man, however, as the model of the soul is tripartite:  reason, spirit, and appetite.  The philosopher-ruler grasps the intelligible realm possessing knowledge, and thus keeps the other parts of his soul in order, that is, the spirited and appetitive.  This is the only perfect society, the only ordered polis, the only healthy, just political community.  To show why justice is better than injustice, Socrates analyzes the imperfect societies as the individual soul writ-large.  The easiest way to see how a polis becomes corrupt is to see how a man’s character becomes corrupt.  And, the way to prove justice is better than injustice is to show how miserable and evil the most degenerate soul is—that of the tyrant.  Being the furtherest remove from the philosopher-king, the tyrant is the evil incarnate, a man who soul is disordered to the maximum degree, and who is utterly and completely bad, and thus, unhappy.  This decline occurs gradually, and so Plato gives us gradations of measurement so that a sick soul and society can be diagnosis and treated before it becomes terminally ill.

                Voegelin diagram’s this model of the polis:

stratum             character            virtues (ordering powers)


archontes        bouleutikon        | sophia    |                    |
phylakes          epikourikon       | andreia   | sophrosyne | dikaiosyne
georgoi            chrematistikon  |                |                    |

The three classes of society: rulers, guardians, and workers correspond to the three characteristics of men in those classes:  knowledge, spirit, and physical.  It is justice (dikaiosyne) as the highest virtue which orders the entire soul keeping the parts in proper place.  In short, reason governs passions with the middle part of spirit (sophrosyne) operating as a moderating force.

With this construct in mind, the ordering decline can be seen more clearly.  The analysis of transition from timocracy to oligarchy to democracy to tyranny is explained as the predominance of one part of the soul over the other.  It is a perversion of order not disorder per se.  Even the tyrannical soul as evil has order to it, the problem is its utter perversion of the good.  Essentially, the descent of the forms of imperfect societies is caused by a metamorphosis of eros or passions.  The timocratic man whose passion is spirited competition and courage transfers that energy to the wrong object:  money, becoming the oligarchic character whose one ambition is greedy gain, which then breaks apart into the anarchy of the democratic man whose every whim and wish is fulfilled.  That cannot last long—anarchy of the soul---is so unnatural that the tyrannical man takes over with his master passion, a concentration of insatiable desire, because of its intensity rules all else—this is the addictive personality who paradoxically loses all freedom and becomes a slave despite his apparent strength and control.

Why is any of this important? the immortality of the soul.  That which is divine, eternal, and immutable is that which is crucial in politics and society and as such is the measure of the best polis.  Ending with the Pamphylian myth of eternal rewards and punishments for man’s choices of what kind of soul he will engender, Plato brings to fruition his original claim that justice is better than injustice; and thus, politics has a transcendent nature far beyond conventional notions.


 

 

Copyright © 1997-2008 The Lonergan Institute for 'the Good Under Construction.' All rights reserved. All material on this site is copyrighted unless otherwise specified..
1